| || |
(1:03) Now here's the tricky part: this is the truth, and, this is a great lie. This is indeed how much Ultra Violet Light leaves our Star over the longer time frames in the 11-year Solar Cycles; it's fairly steady. But how much is getting through to Earth?
(1:22) 2003: a NASA article titled 'Earth's Inconstant Magnetic Field.' Sorry for those looking for an impending doomsday-it's not that kind of article-but it was one of the first mentions of our Magnetic Pole shifting; moving 40 kilometers per year after centuries of near inactivity.
Good evening 0bservers, this will be the first of many more descriptive videos about some important points of 'The Great Climate Lie' on which I often focus.(0:10)
You can do this along side me, if you'd like, in another tab or window; we're pulling up Climate.gov
Now at the bottom of their homepage, you see the great data comparator: the default time scale they show, it's the yellow at the bottom, just 30 years; it's their best way to make their point using these graphs.(0:31)
I'm going to add Sunlight, up at the top, and extend the timeline back to 1880; that's as far as she goes. Notice below that they've decided not to include CO2 data back that far, and there's a very good reason for that…(0:45)
But today we're focusing on the Sun, measured in watts per square meter, which isn't as important as the fact that they only show it between 1361 and 1362; riding up and down the Solar Cycle, which is about a 0.1% variation over that long time-frame.
Now here's the tricky part: this is the truth, and, this is a great lie. This is indeed how much Ultra Violet Light leaves our Star over the longer time frames in the 11-year Solar Cycles; it's fairly steady. But how much is getting through to Earth? (1:22)
2003: a NASA article titled 'Earth's Inconstant Magnetic Field.'
Sorry for those looking for an impending doomsday-it's not that kind of article-but it was one of the first mentions of our Magnetic Pole shifting; moving 40 kilometers per year after centuries of near inactivity. (1:40)
But more importantly here: the strength of Earth's Magnetic Field, our shield against energy from the Sun and Galaxy, is 10% weaker than it was in the mid 19th Century. (1:52)
That same time scale we just saw the Sun have allegedly have no change according to another arm of the government. (1:59)
Scientists have further proven that we've actually been under a 'weakening shield' since the 1600's.
The is from the WDC for Geomagnetism in Kyoto, Japan
: visualizing the weakening pink to blue, including the current South Atlantic Anomaly. (2:16)
It doesn't exactly feel good to know that they're focused on only what's leaving our Star and not our protective interface with it. (2:25)
If you'd like to see more about why they don't give CO2 data back that far, how Earth's magnetism is changing, the other ways the Sun heats our planet besides just UV Sunlight, and some even more convincing facts about our atmospheric collapse, over-ionized F-Layer and large scale shifts in the entire Solar System see these essential background videos…you can just type these into google:'They Want to Blame You' 'Energy from Space' 'The Next Ice Age'(2:49)
Eyes open, no fear. Be safe everyone.
Original Video by 'Suspicious0bservers': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnsoFFVYSZk
| || |
"Let's Review: CO2 and Temperature are astoundingly correlated over thousands of years, but Human Pollution broke that trend years ago. We'll get to the cooling mechanisms in a moment. But the last few hundred years have actually been remarkably calm. The Magnetic Poles are only really kicking their shift into gear in the late 19th Century and now NASA says our Magnetic Shield from Space is 10% weaker. Weaker against energy from the Sun of all types and against Galactic Radiation..."
Transcript for S0's Video: "They Want to Blame You - (A21CS Section 1.2)
Global Warming and Carbon Dioxide, you know the story. It's flirting with 400 parts per million
in the Atmosphere, which to most people means nothing. (0:20)
But that was concluded via 'Ice Cores
' and other data sources. And that temperature has been correlated with important Greenhouse Gases for hundreds of thousands of years.(0:31)
Just looking at temperature and CO2 that matches remarkable over those time frames, but, I have a confession to make: I am hiding part of this chart
-over on the right-and it's the most important part of the data.(0:46)
Here's the whole thing: at least the last one I could find updated. The uptick began with human pollution. We know CO2 is even higher than this now, and the Global Temperatures have indeed continued on par for the course without regard for the rising CO2.(1:02)
In fact, it was considered something of a small miracle in these circles when the IPCC
appeared to concede one point. Even though their position on Climate Change remained firm.(1:12)
And that's an important distinction: Climate Change versus Global Warming. Indeed, even without major, total warming recently there have been extreme heat events. But cold as well.(1:26)
Europe and parts of Russia and India have seen terrible winters
in the past few years; as harsh as some of the recent summers were hot. And now, indeed their extreme has swung the other way for a good portion of the 2013 Northern Summer.(1:40) The United States
have mostly been on the warming end. In fact, 2012 was impressively warm from January through most of the latter months.(1:48)
But as of August 30th, 2013 the US has been setting more cold records than heat records. Even as the average total temperature does continue to increase slightly.(2:00) The U.S.
saw tremendous floods in 2011, almost as a side note to a number of Tornado records falling and hundreds of deaths. 2012 brought the Drought, had January Tornado outbreaks with wild heat, then tornadoes became sporadic in the usual active months. And so far 2013 has been remarkably low for tornado output and our season began much later than normal. The North Central states have seen more than usual, along with Australia and New Zealand.(2:30)
The Science of CO2 heating mechanisms via things like 'insulation' is too large a topic for this presentation. But, it is incontrovertible.(2:41)
However, so are some of the well known cooling mechanisms, like the one described by NASA, here
, which we'll discuss in more detail in a few minutes.Take Aways:
- CO2/Temperature no longer correlate
- CO2 can both heat and cool
- Climate Change is shifts between extremes
For now, simply remember that the Earth's temperature might not be so sensitive to Carbon Dioxide. When humans began pumping CO2 into the air, the correlation with temperature broke. We'll come back to those cooling roles of CO2 and also remember that the climate extremes seem to be swinging in all directions.(3:09)
In fact, there is growing discussion about a possible impending 'Mini-Ice Age.
' We have been tracking a Solar Shutdown at our YouTube channel for nearly two years.
| || |
(0:11) Folks, there is no doubt about it: the planet is warming up. However, if one has access to all the information one could objectively reason that 'Climate Extremes' is a more appropriate moniker than Global Warming.
(0:25) The examples are so numerous, and it's not just temperatures but severe weather, flooding, drought. And amidst trend and propaganda there remains a significant possibility that a Solar Shut-down could swing us into an Ice Age within a few years.
The experts have recognized mechanisms for such a shift and concerned parties range from individuals at NASA, and the NSO, who potentially see the next Cycle without Sunspots. And numerous, numerous others.(3:32)
'The Shutdown,' oddly, is not a matter of normal everyday irradiance and luminosity
, but one of Magnetism. The entire Sun emits light and radiance, but the Sunspots and emanating Magnetic Field have been fading consistently.(3:47)
We are at the doorstep of our next cycle
, which may be extremely weak. For more information on these Solar Mechanisms, see: "How to Watch the Sun." Just put it into any Search Engine. The practical effect of fading magnetics
means less energetic flaring and solar plasma interaction.(4:05)
The mechanisms for a 'Cooling Trend
' are described by Irish Scientist, Dr. Elliot. He explains why we are still showing warming signs on the potential path to ice.(4:15)
In truth, there is another reason Earth sees heat. The energy transfer from the Sun is constant over most of it, but, when the Magnetic Fields of the Sun are missing the Coronal Holes come out.(4:27)
Another in-depth topic, but simply: these increasingly present masses contain Alfvén Waves
that more effectively transfer energy to the planets than the surrounding fields.(4:38)
This outward force is powerful enough to push Solar Wind particles out ahead of it like an electromagnetic shovel bunching up the solar snow on the blade. Characterized by spikes in Solar Wind
density, just before the speed of the particles rises to reveal the extreme outward force of the Coronal Holes by comparison.(4:57)
The takeaways here, besides a potential Ice Age, involve a method for increased energy transfer via Coronal Holes. Explained by NASA and tracked at our YouTube channel for years. But we are certainly not done discussing the incoming Energy from Space. While CO2 sits suspect in the waiting room and Coronal Holes showing up regularly; we must consider a third point.(5:22) Earth's Magnetism
has benignly remained steady for quite some time, until now. Lets start with Earth's magnetic North Pole. Since the World became a sphere circling the Sun in the eyes of man, the pole has chosen to reside those few hundred years in Northern Canada; offset from the Geographic Poles as usual.(5:42)
But since the late 19th Century, the pole has shifted faster and faster towards Siberia; now clocked around 40 miles per year. The South Pole is shifting in kind, but at a much slower rate.(5:55)
The more important aspect of Earth's Magnetic Shift is in our Magnetosphere, our Magnetic Shield; Earth's interface with deadly Energy from Space.
| || |
The Magnetic Pole Shift
(3:39) Earth's magnetism changes in other ways, as the pole shift you may have heard about, has indeed begun.
(3:45) Over 73 years, the normal movement of the Magnetic North Pole was slightly above average, but after that it began racing faster. 1904 to 1972 represents a shorter 68-year time period, then it took that same large jump in less than 30 years.
(6:04) Here it is
: pink is good back in the 1600's, but the blue-indicative of weaker fields-has crept in over time and according to NASA, the field is 10% weaker
than it was in the 19th Century, which is about the same time those Magnetic Poles developed a lead-foot for the accelerator.(6:23)
Now this is not to say we're going to fry, because there is no evidence to suggest we ever lose our field entirely over time; even in a complete flip. But what happens when you consider the state of our shield in terms of what we've already learned.(6:38)
Here's the Official US Government
take on the climate: the Sun, unchanging up top as a climate factor, and they use the bottom lines to correlate CO2 and Temperature. Their Solar claims are based on that luminosity and general irradiance described earlier, which indeed varies only 0.1% over an 11 year cycle, which is the change you see here represented here at the top line.(7:04)
But you already know that there's much more than just the UV light emitted across the surface, some of these [Solar Cycle Irradiance, X-Ray Flare Radiation, Coronal Mass Ejections, Coronal Holes] even do a better job of juicing up the Planets (7:13)
In addition to ignoring those things, we see no accounting for a weaker Magnetosphere, which plays at least some role in nearly every energetic interaction with Earth. But least of all, the irradiance they've chosen to highlight. (7:28)
There's more: as the Solar Magnetic Fields are weakening
, the Sunspot's decrease in size and frequency. The Sun's magnetic shield weakens in kind. We have already examined the possibility that these fields will continue to weaken and remain weak. (7:44)
Just like the Earth has it's Magnetosphere, the Sun has the Heliosphere extending far out past Earth and even Pluto. The Galaxy is a harsh place and the Sun's massive shield protects all the planets from Cosmic Rays. But it's fading with the Sun's magnetics.(8:01) The mechanisms for Ozone destruction and climate forcing with Cosmic Radiation are well studied, and you can find some good links in the publicly available citation list.Let's Review: (8:10) CO2 and Temperature are astoundingly correlated over thousands of years, but Human Pollution broke that trend years ago. We'll get to the cooling mechanisms in a moment. But the last few hundred years have actually been remarkably calm. The Magnetic Poles are only really kicking their shift into gear in the late 19th Century and now NASA says our Magnetic Shield from Space is 10% weaker. Weaker against energy from the Sun of all types and against Galactic Radiation. Due Diligence reveals no evidence of these factors in widely cited studies on the Climate nor on the Official Government Websites.(8:49)
And we are now left with a most glaring point: if these things are true we should also be seeing changes on the other planets.(8:57) In 2012, ESA's Venus Spacecraft
detected that the rotation speed of Venus had slowed. It's day is six and a half minutes longer. We recently learned of it's latest finding: the wind speeds on Venus are increasing
. Already up 33% over just the last 6 years; imagine if 2019 had 200 mph hurricanes with regularity.(9:19)
Another planet slowing it's rotation is Saturn
. The most impressive changes there, however, is the 'set your watch storm' on Saturn every 30 years that lasts a few weeks. Except this latest episode was a decade early, a leviathan and lasted for 200 days.(9:37)
Jupiter is the most changing planet; we've long had scopes capable of seeing his spots. One like Red Jr.
was a novel appearance, however, in our time of viewing. So was losing a stripe, this isn't like a storm system; this is a systemic shift. And now, after decades of listening in radio wave lengths Zeus sings a new song
for those willing to listen.(10:00)
We've been watching Uranus
for a long time, but we just recently were able to image it's Auroras. National Geographic ran this article in 2007: the data surrounding warming of the planets
in our system is both vast and taboo in the mainstream science community.
| || |
(0:01) Hey Folks, it came to my attention that some are not really sure what the big picture is; some have even suggested this channel doesn't seem to indicate any changes are happening.
(0:10) As baffling as that is to some of you, and me, and I hate to keep repeating things, but in truth there are about 20,000 people who weren't here the last time I did this so I'll review…but I'm going to do it fast.
(0:20) Earth's Poles are shifting, Magnetic Poles that is...
Some of those changes would have major implications if they happened on Earth. Our climate and Geomagnetic Shifts are undeniable, but in many ways tame in comparison to what we see on other planets and especially what we see on the Sun. I'd like to share with you some of the less known changes on our planet…Most people don't know about these Earth changes:(10:33)
The Critical Frequency of the F1 layer is significant for radio communication, but it is indirectly indicative of energy at that layer of the atmosphere; it boringly goes up and down with the Solar Cycle maintaining a nice arc. Until 2007 when we began to see signal degradation of stronger and stronger propagations; it's spiralling out of control and they just took this data stream offline in the Spring of 2013. There is no replacement.First Seen in 1885:(11:05) Noctilucent Clouds
were first seen around that first time that Earth's Magnetics began breaking and have been rare summer Polar phenomenon until recently. They've exploded earlier, stronger, longer and later baffling scientists. These are the highest clouds there are directly below the Thermosphere.(11:23)
Popular Science is beginning to blame CO2 for their recent explosion and also for the collapse of Earth's Upper Atmosphere
, which they claim to otherwise not be able to explain. However, NASA has claimed that the lack of Flares at Solar Minimum collapses the Atmosphere. Rather, it takes flares to prop it up every Solar Maximum as it's always trying to collapse. Those same flares are what we're lacking with the Solar Magnetic Shutdown we discussed earlier.(11:50)
But lets just assume for a moment that our highest layers are collapsing and exploding with Noctilucent Clouds because of CO2 and nothing else. The aforementioned cooling mechanism of CO2 only works up there. CO2 is one of the two most efficient coolants in Earth's Thermosphere, in this example given by NASA: it helped deflect 95%
of a significant Geoeffective Solar Event. They have described intake events that could power major cities for days or longer.CO2 and other human-driven emissions have unquestionable forcing mechanisms. (12:21)
As previously stated: Humans are not helping our climate with much of what we're doing.Began in the 1800s: Sun and other Planets are involved too.(12:27)
But this event truly appears to have begun long before Humans ramped our pollution, which actually can only be tied to breaking it's perfect correlation with temperature.How do we reconcile this information?(12:37)
And I am still waiting for a totality of the circumstances explanation from our climate experts. Why would they do this? Why blame us? And most importantly…
What the heck does this have to do with Agenda 21
? There are aspects of Agenda 21 that will not be easily accepted by most people. Some aspects will inevitably be seen as impinging on freedoms or sovereignty. Let's just say…there is a reason the official 2012 Republican platform is expressly against Agenda 21 and there are organisations like 'Democrats Against Agenda 21' and other similarly-minded nonpartisan groups. The shift in our climate cannot be stopped by me or you, but if you blame yourself: You put your future in the hands of those who 'told you so.'
Coming Soon: Chapter 2 "The Existing Opposition"
Original Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-RvUedfKpk
Citation List: http://www.suspicious0bservers.org/links/
| | After the second day of tracking density spikes in the Solar Wind at just after 03:30 UTC, I noticed that this morning's spike in proton density correlates with the 10:45 PM CDT start of the fire on the Hercules 265 drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico on Tuesday night.
This article will explore the possible connection between fire on the Hercules 265 drilling rig and our weak solar wind, magnetic field due to low solar activity and a recent uptick in galactic cosmic ray activity.
Keep in mind that the location of this incident was in the CDT Time Zone which is -5 Hours UTC. So this 03:30 UTC spike in solar wind density occurred at 10:30 CDT near the Hercules 265 drilling rig. Here is a link
to the iFrame (below), on Space Weather and the GMF in offshore drilling:
Images from Left to Right:
ACE Solar Wind shows the density (orange) spiking up to 40-50 protons/cm3 just after 3:30 UTC the morning of July 24th, 2013 which was 10:30 PM local time on Hercules 265.
Sonoma Gamma Ray Burst Monitor shows the most recent burst occurring at 08:19 UTC on July 22nd from the Constellation Ophiuchus.
ACE Solar Wind (again) shows the higher of the two density spikes at 03:30 UTC on the morning of July 23rd; this density spike was up over 100 protons/cm3 and occurred a day after the GRB.
"The geomagnetic field can be expressed as the vector sum of the contributions from three main sources: the main field generated in the Earth’s core, the crustal field from the local rocks and a combined disturbance field from various currents flowing in the upper atmosphere and magnetosphere, which also induce electrical currents in the sea and ground [space weather]."
The image on the right is the June-July 2013 Cosmic Ray Variation via the Moscow Neutron Station
, as you can see it starts to spike heading into the 20's of July as the low solar activity led to a lack in Forbush Decreases which protect Earth from the more harmful effects of Space Weather, such as CRV.
In the Paper
"Impact of Galactic Cosmic Rays on Earth's Atmosphere and Human Health" the authors add on to an accepted definition of space weather: "'Recently, Lilensten and Belehaki (2009) have defined the term 'space weather' as 'the physical and phenomenological state of natural space environments. The associated discipline aims, through observation, monitoring, analysis and modelling, at understanding and predicting the state of the Sun, the interplanetary and planetary environments, and the solar and non-solar driven perturbations that affect them, and also forecasting and nowcasting the potential impacts on biological and technological systems.'
When we talk about space weather, we can often conjure images of large coronal mass ejections (CMEs) or dramatic solar flares that drive spectacular effects in the Earth’s near-space environment. Apart from it, high speed solar wind streams and Galactic Cosmic Rays are also very important as driving activity in the Earth’s magnetosphere and are responsible for geomagnetic activities."
Images via NASA
on Earth's changing Magnetic Field:
"Earth's magnetic field is changing in other ways, too: Compass needles in Africa, for instance, are drifting about 1 degree per decade. And globally the magnetic field has weakened 10% since the 19th century."
S0 continues this discussion in Energy from Space 2.0
(2:06) Globally our protective magnetic shield is 10% weaker than it was in the 19th Century and the World Center for Geomagnetism claims the weakening began in the 1600's.
(2:15) That's Earth's protective interface with 'Energy from Space,' 10% gone; 10% more energy coming in
. Not just the extra Solar Energy they measure, but on all wavelengths and frequencies; not to mention the Cosmic Ray and Gamma Ray Bursts not coming from the Sun.
(4:37) Solar Wind is relatively quiet on both SOHO and here on ACE. Kp-Index shows we're all green.
(4:44) After yesterday's Sunspots slowdown the flares calmed down further as well. There are three active regions notable on the Earth-facing disk.
(5:05) Folks, all Earth's connectivity is still in that coronal hole..."You know what happens when magnetic fields of the Sun are absent: we get coronal holes, Alfvén waves
and better energy transfer from the Sun to the planets; at least according to NASA."
According to the ESA Space Weather Study: "It should be noted that a decreased solar activity implies an increased intensity of galactic cosmic rays entering the Earth’s atmosphere. This is due to the more free propagation path of the rays in the less intense solar wind (Svensmark and Friis-Christensen, 1997)."
Looking back at two studies from 2000: "High energy particles striking the atmosphere produce a secondary population (cosmic ray showers) and changed the ionization level of the atmosphere, thereby modify the electrical environment. The sources of ionization in the atmosphere are solar radiation (especially UV), cosmic ray fluxes, X-ray solar flare and radioactivity (effective at altitudes < 3 km). The main source of ionization up to the 60 km altitude in CRs and above to this altitude solar UV becomes important (Bazilevskaya, 2000)... There are two ways that Galactic Cosmic Rays can affect space weather systems: (a) the high energy charged particles produce direct changes in materials/systems exposed to them both in space and above the surface of the Earth, (b) the anisotropic distribution of GCRs inci- dent on the Earth’s atmosphere affects atmospheric processes differently, which manifest themselves as latitudinal, longitudinal dependencies. Cosmic ray anisotropies may also be used as a tool for remote sensing of magnetic field changes in the heliosphere (Kudela et al., 2000)."
A Brief History of Induced Currents in Oil and Gas Pipeline from the "Solar Storm Threat Analysis
" by James A. Marusek: "Geomagnetic induced currents affect oil and gas pipelines. In pipelines, GIC and the associated pipe-to-soil voltages can increase the rate of corrosion in pipelines especially in high latitude regions. Damage resulting from corrosion is cumulative in nature and can eventually lead to pipeline integrity failures and major fuel leaks. As an example, GICs reaching 57 amps were measured in a Finnish natural gas pipeline in November 1998. Solar storms may have had a hand in the gas pipeline rupture and explosion on 4 June 1989 that demolished part of the Trans-Siberian Railway, engulfing two passenger trains in flames and killing 500 people, many of these were school children heading off on a vacation in the Urals."
It seems that the collapsing atmosphere and weakened state of the Earth's magnetic field and Sun's Heliosphere is allowing a greater impact from Galactic Cosmic Rays and according to ESA's
"Space Weather Catalogue" the "Interaction between cosmic rays/solar energetic particles and the atmosphere creates a lot of secondaries, including pions, muons and neutrons. Some of these neutrons can escape the planet and decay in its vicinity, producing protons and electrons." Just like the protons in the density spikes just after 03:30 UTC...curiouser and curiouser!
Public Enemy Number 1: Stress – A Connection to Space Weather’s Daily Impacts
Our biological bodies are responding to stress in many different ways and it can be a trigger in sudden death through heart attacks and strokes, or even in diseases like cancer. Stress factors are individual, however, there are some biological stressors all humans have in common.
People generally refer to it as sensitivity to changes in the weather, and most of us have experienced it or know someone who has, be it family or friends. Of those who claim to feel changes in weather or seasons, the most common examples are spring fever and winter depression.
So what? Why is this happening and what is causing it?
It is important to pay attention to the fact that we live in an environment where everything is in constant change, even though we are not aware of many of these changes taking place.
The geomagnetic field is creating a underlying a set of frequencies that are also steering the 24 hour day and night rhythm, via the Pineal Gland
which is located in the middle of a vertebrate’s brain. Studies have shown that, periods with geomagnetic disturbances, add an additional stress factor to our environment and to our state of health, well being.
Hans Selye, was a Hungarian who pioneered endocrinologist and introduced his work about the General Adaptation Syndrome in 1936 with a model that shows in three phases what the alleged effects of stress have on the body.
| |The paper ‘On the Nature of People’s Reaction to Space Weather and Meteorological Weather Changes’ from Khabarova and Dimitrova (2009) make a connection to space weather and Selyes work. The research team summarized: “He showed that the human organism’s response to any permanent stressors is always the same (this means nonspecific reaction of the organism). From this point of view, there is no difference which factor affects the people – sharp meteo-weather changes or space weather changes, the medical devices register the same picture for any detectable health status characteristic.”
So any permenant stress will invoke the same response in the body; the body does not categorize sensational changes. Furthermore, in Khabarova and Dimitrova work:“In spite of relatively not too high linear correlation between long time series of weather (or space weather) parameters and human health characteristics, the sharp changes of weather and space weather definitely stimulate a sharp response of the human organism. We have proved that these changes are identical for human reaction to any “weather” type. There is no difference for an organism - which stressor affects it. Its response is typical demonstration of the General Adaptation Syndrome by Hanz Selye.”
In Selyes General Adaption Syndrom Model, he shows three stages of stress: Reaction, Resistance, and Exhaustion. The stage of Exhaustion is most dangerous because the body becomes susceptible to any diseases.
Khabarova and Dimitrova were determining an increase in the number of cardiac and infectious diseases, traffic and industrial accidents, heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths, cellular changes, etc. during short-period variations of space weather and geomagnetic field. In their paper, Khabarova and Dimitrova also observed bio-effects during quiet space weather periods without geomagnetic disturbances, which leads to the conclusion that it's not the intensity of an event that matters, but that it can just be the fact that there is a “small” change or “low” variation in activity which disrupts the established pattern, Earth's resonance frequency.
Why is this more important than ever?
Earths environment is in a constant state of change and at the moment we are going through a period in which the magnetic poles are moving
a tad rapidly and the Earth’s magnetic field is weakening. As a result, less strength of the magnetic field means less shields around the planet and so any and all space weather events have a bigger impact on the Earth.
NASA's Article ‘Earth's Inconstant Magnetic Field
’ points this out:“Earth's magnetic field is changing in other ways, too: Compass needles in Africa, for instance, are drifting about 1 degree per decade. And globally the magnetic field has weakened 10% since the 19th century.”
So, knowing all of that, what can be done in times of change?
In times of stress, calming down is essential so there are different techniques to help the body handling stressors. Even short, deep-breathing and meditation exercises will change conciousness if done on a regular basis.
Just 10 minutes of breathing exercises will lead to calmer reactions in stressful situations and this effort will snowball over time, which can lead to a healthier lifestyle and prolonged life span.
Here is an excellent PDF on a few Kundalini Meditation Techniques
proven to alleviate stress, addiction:
Pull Quote:"In modern culture, the imbalance is pandemic. If we are not addicted to smoking, eating, drinking, or drugs, then we are addicted subconsciously to acceptance, advancement, rejection, emotional love, etc. All these lead us to insecure and neurotic behavior patterns. The imbalance in this pineal area upsets the radiance of the pineal gland itself. It is this pulsating radiance that regulates the pituitary gland. Since the pituitary regulates the rest of the glandular system, the entire body and mind go out of balance. This meditation corrects the problem (Yogi Bhajan cited in Khalsa, 1988).Meditation to balance the Jupiter and Saturn energies: A technique useful for treating depression,
focusing the mind, and eliminating self-destructive behavior Description of technique. Sit with a straight spine. The hands are facing forward with the ends of the Jupiter (index) and Saturn (middle) fingers pointing straight up near the sides of the body at the level of the eye. Close the ring
and little fingers down to the palm using the thumbs. The Jupiter finger and the Saturn finger are spread open in a “V” shape (or closed). The eyes are closed. For 8 minutes open and close the Jupiter and Saturn fingers approximately once per second or two."
First, some details on Magnetic Portals or what S0 occasionally calls the 'Earth Footprint'
referring to the Sun-Earth Variable Magnetic Connection
Since 2008 NASA has asserted
that every 8 minutes, "A magnetic portal will open, linking Earth to the Sun 93 million miles away. Tons of high-energy particles may flow through the opening before it closes again...It's called a flux transfer event or 'FTE.'"
The article also outlines how FTE's form: "On the dayside of Earth (the side closest to the sun), Earth's magnetic field presses against the sun's magnetic field. Approximately every eight minutes, the two fields briefly merge or "reconnect," forming a portal through which particles can flow. The portal takes the form of a magnetic cylinder about as wide as Earth. The European Space Agency's fleet of four Cluster spacecraft and NASA's five THEMIS probes have flown through and surrounded these cylinders, measuring their dimensions and sensing the particles that shoot through."
Below is a screenshot, link
to a useful PDF on Solar Flares Earth changes:
Image of what a Magnetic Portal could look like.
July 7, 2012: X-Flare, Gamma Ray Burst
(0:43) Having a look at the Solar Wind: the 'yellow' is the speed jumping up and down around 500 km/s, which is too fast to be nothing. The 'orange' is the density and there is no continuity: together these suggest that many little CME's are hitting Earth, don't forget we've had a ton of M-Flares, we're up to 26 actually.
(1:01) Most of them have pumped out bits of ejecta, enough so that around 17:00 UTC yesterday the Solar Wind began breaking through our Magnetosphere; that's the 'red' spike.
(1:09) You can see the sudden onset of particle bombardment in our electrojet, here, on Ovation Prime. It actually caused a brief Geomagnetic Storm, but then, just as our shields were down, BOOM!
(1:19) An X-Class Solar Flare cooked our highest protective layers and made a visibly unimpressive, but scientifically significant impact. And even though the 'Earth Footprint' is not updated, I believe it was connected to that Sunspot because we developed a radiation storm almost immediately; we're still in it now.
The bit reported right before this excerpt is about LARGE Gamma Ray Burst, Cosmic Ray readings. These cosmic rays cluster around and form icy areas in the atmosphere, inducing cloud formation and coupling with CFC's to destroy Ozone.
On the videos on the right, July 8th and July 9th, 2012 we can see the effects of Space Weather events building up to the melting of Greenland's Ice Sheet by July 12th, 2012.
S0s Videos Before Greenland's Melt!
Some Coverage on the Rapid Extent of Greenland's Continental Ice Sheet Melt:
On July 9th, 2012 S0 discusses the Radiation Storms that had popped up and were subsiding. Flare activity continued. NASA noticed this
(image on the right) taking place in Greenland on July 8, 2013: "Extent of surface melt over Greenland’s ice sheet on July 8 (left) and July 12 (right). Measurements from three satellites showed that on July 8, about 40 percent of the ice sheet had undergone thawing at or near the surface. In just a few days, the melting had dramatically accelerated and an estimated 97 percent of the ice sheet surface had thawed by July 12."
According to NASA's Article: "The melting spread quickly. Melt maps derived from the three satellites showed that on July 8, about 40 percent of the ice sheet's surface had melted. By July 12, 97% had melted. This extreme melt event coincided with an unusually strong ridge of warm air, or a heat dome, over Greenland. The ridge was one of a series that has dominated Greenland's weather since the end of May… The latest heat dome started to move over Greenland on July 8, and then parked itself over the ice sheet about three days later. By July 16, it had begun to dissipate."
The strong ridges of warm air at the end of May were due to the flurry of M-Flares the Earth was receiving.
With frequent Radiation, Geomagnetic Storms and Earth's magnetic connectivity to various active regions and Flaring Sunspots it's clear what caused Greenland's Ice to melt so quickly.
The reason this took place over Greenland in the Summertime is outline in this article about 'Volcanoes and Ozone'
: "The chemical reactions that destroy ozone speed up when particles like ice crystals are in the air, because the ice crystals provide a surface on which the reactions can occur. That is why an "ozone hole" appears over the Antarctic each winter. There are no more CFCs there than elsewhere, but there are more ice crystals: more tiny platforms on chemical reactions can take place."
Mix in the massive Cosmic Ray Event on July 6, 2013
, since "cosmic rays
control the electrical system of the atmosphere which in turn affects cloud microphysics and radiative transfer of the atmosphere. Both clouds and radiative transfer change the global temperature and thus affect climate change" and these events led to Record Arctic Ice Melt in August
Image of Greenland's 97% Ice Sheet melting from July 8th (image on the left) to July 12th, 2012 (on the right).
Video by NASA on Magnetic Portals
"Portals form via the process of magnetic reconnection. Mingling lines of magnetic force from the Sun and Earth criss-cross and join to create openings.
These 'X-points' are the sudden joining of magnetic fields can propel jets of charged particles from the X-point, creating an 'electron diffusion region.'"
"Of particular importance is the sun's extreme ultraviolet (EUV) radiation, which peaks during the years around solar maximum. Within the relatively narrow band of EUV wavelengths, the sun’s output varies not by a minuscule 0.1%, but by whopping factors of 10 or more.
This can strongly affect the chemistry and thermal structure of the upper atmosphere."
Aside from what happened to the World Trade Centers there was also a lot of solar activity taking place on the Sun since these events occurred during the last Solar Maximum
. Anomalous Magnetometer Data
from across the globe showed that: "An eruption occurred on the Sun, travelled to Earth, and globally disturbed the local geomagnetic field at several moments of highly unusual human events."
This is what's known as a Flux Transfer Event and these vents are forever opening and closing as the magnetic portal
connecting the Sun and the Earth changes every 8 minutes.
Below is a video of Solar Flaring on the Sun from September 11th to September 13th, 2001 on SOHO LASCO C2:
From Left to Right:
1.Screenshot shows 12 Solar Flares on September 11, 2001.
2.Screenshot shows 8 Solar Flares on September 12, 2001.
3.Screenshot shows 9 Solar Flares on September 13, 2001.
images above we can see the total number of Solar Flares
from September 10th to September 13th, 2001 totals at 39. That's a lot of solar activity, compared to our current cycle
Talkin' Physics: Did you know the speed of light and gravitational 'constant' vary?
| || |
Graphic from the Facebook page 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' I'd like to open a dialogue about the magnetic anomaly that occurred and (ignoring all else for the moment) that maybe the rate of fall for the buildings was due to a variation in the gravitational 'constant' which has varied by 1.3% in recent years. Or just a change in direct current...
The following are excerpts from Rupert Sheldrake's Banned Ted Talk: 'The Science Delusion'Morphic Resonance: everything depends on evolving habits not on fixed laws.
(9:52) I want to spend a few moments on the 'constants of nature' too, because these are again are assumed to be constant. Things like the gravitational constant, the speed of light are called the fundamental constants. Are they really constant?
(10:07) Well, when I got interested in this question I tried to find out, they're given in physics handbooks; handbooks in physics list the existing fundamental constants and tell you their value, but I wanted to see if they had changed.
(10:21) So I got the old volumes of physical handbooks and I went to the patent office library here in London, and they're the only place I could find that kept the old volumes; you know normally people throw them away when the new values come out they throw away the old ones.
(10:36) When I did this I found that the speed of light dropped between 1928 and 1945 by about 20 km/s, that's a huge drop because they are given with errors within a fractions of decimal point of error.
(10:52) And yet, all over the world it dropped. And they were all getting values very similar to each other with tiny errors and then in 1948 it went up again and then people started getting very similar news again.
(11:08) I was very intrigued by this and I couldn't make sense of it so I went to see the head of Meteorology at the National Physical Laboratory in Teddington; Meteorology is the science in which people measures constants.
(11:21) And I asked him about this, I said, "What do you make of this drop in the speed of light between 1928 and 1945?"
(11:29) And he said, "Oh dear, you've uncovered the most embarrassing episode in the history of our science."
(11:37) So, I said, "Well, could the speed of light have actually dropped and that would have amazing implications if so."
(11:42) He said, "No, no, of course it couldn't have actually dropped, it's a constant."
(11:47) So, "Oh, well then how do you explain the fact that everyone was finding it going must slower during that period? Is it because they were fudging their results to get to what they thought other people should be getting and the whole thing was just produced in the minds of physicists?"
(12:04) He said, "We don't like to use the word Fudge," and I said, "What do you prefer?" And he said, "We prefer to call it intellectual phase-locking."
(12:20) So, I said, "Well if it was going on then how can we be so sure it's not going on today and that the present values aren't produced by intellectual phase-locking?" And he said, "Oh, we know that's not the case." And I said, "how do we know?" And he said, "Well, we've solved the problem."
(12:35) And I said, "Well how?" And he said, "Well we fixed the speed of light by definition in 1972." So I said, "but it might still change…" And he said, "Yes, but we'd never know because we've defined the meter in terms of speed of light so the units change with it." So he looked very please about that, they'd fixed that problem.
(12:57) But I said, "Well then, what about Big G? The gravitational constant known in the trade as 'Big G' because it's written with a capital G. Newtons Universal Gravitational Constant that's varied by 1.3% in recent years and it seems to vary from place to place and from time to time."
(13:17) And he said, "Oh well those are just errors." And unfortunately there are quiet big errors with Big G. So I said, "What if it's really changing? Perhaps it's really changing…"
Pull Quote on Variable Rate of Radioactive Decay:"That's when they discovered something strange. The data produced gave random numbers for the individual atoms, yes, but the overall decay wasn't constant, flying in the face of the accepted rules of chemistry...Intriguingly, the decay seemed to vary with the seasons, with the rate a little faster in the winter and a little slower in the summer."
(13:29) And then I looked at how they do it: what happens is they measure it in different labs, they get different values on different days and then they average them. And then, other labs around the world do the same and they come out, usually, with a rather different average and then the International Committee on Meteorology meets every 10 years or so and averages the ones from labs from around the world to come up with the value of Big G.
(13:51) But what if G were actually fluctuating, what if it changed? There's already evidence actually that it changes through out the day and throughout the year...
(14:11) Maybe they all change together, what if these 'errors' are going up together and down together. For more than 10 years I've been trying to persuade Meteorologists to look at the raw data, in fact I am now trying to persuade them to put it online on the internet with the dates and the actual measurements and see if they're correlated: to see if they're all up at one time and all down at another.
(14:32) If so they might be fluctuating together and that would tell us something very, very interesting; but no one has done this, they haven't done it because 'G is a constant,' there's no point looking for changes.
(14:43) You see, here is a very simple example of where a dogmatic assumption actually inhibits inquiry. I myself think that the constants may vary quite considerably, well within limits, but they may all varying and I think the day will come when scientific journals, like Nature, will have a weekly report on the constants like stock market reports in newspapers, you know like: this week Big G was slightly up, the charge on the electron was down and the speed of light held steady...
Transcript for The Next Ice Age - An Introduction to a Possible Shift Soon
'The Next Mini Ice Age: Why it might be at our doorstep...'
(0:11) Folks, there is no doubt about it
: the planet is warming up. However, if one has access to all the information
one could objectively reason that 'Climate Extremes' is a more appropriate moniker than Global Warming.
(0:25) The examples are so numerous, and it's not just temperatures but severe weather, flooding, drought
. And amidst trend and propaganda there remains a significant possibility that a Solar Shut-down could swing us into an Ice Age within a few years.
(0:38) I was initially drawn to this topic while investigating Earth changes for which humans deserve no blame. Earth's Upper Atmosphere is shrinking
; more so than for which NASA can account.
(0:49) And if you find some of the many other outlet articles that picked up the story you're likely to find that scientists were expecting some collapse at Solar Minimum, due to a lack of flares that expand the atmosphere; but they weren't expecting this much.
(1:01) So close to the answer: lack of flaring collapses the Atmosphere.
(1:05) Well as Solar Maximum ended in the early 2000's, our Solar Minimum began normally only to encounter turbulence in 2007; when the Coronal Holes left their normal polar positions
(1:16) The Solar Minimum then embraced her name and dove for the floor: setting low records
. And by the time Solar Maximum should have gotten started, we had gone lower; and as the Sunspots slowly began to return they failed to really get a grip on the Sun until March 2011. But look above at how high we'd gone the last Solar Maximum, again in the early 2000's.
(1:37) The 'red' line, here, is very very low expert predictions for this current Maximum
; and actual counts have been even lower. Veteran 0bservers know there is icing on this cake as the Sunspots have not been flaring based on their Magnetic Potential, but instead decaying when facing the Earth for well over a year now.
'The Turning Tide of Discourse'
(1:57) In 2009: Scientists began reacting to the significant Solar Minimum by offering the topic of a Mini Ice Age
up for debate; even if they poo-poo'd the idea for the most part.
(2:08) Fast-forward through the pathetic Solar Maximum we've seen so far; many more scientists are now beginning to discuss how the Sun could effect our climate
(2:17) Looking back to the Great Maunder Minimum: we see that part of the time-frame of Earth's last Mini Ice Age fits this significant time period. NASA and others have now reinforced the concern about a significant Solar Shut-down.
(2:30) This book, written by the scientists for whom that Great Maunder Minimum was named, seems to indicate that our observations of Earth-facing Sunspot decay are not a new phenomenon; in fact, they had a pretty good correlation to a past Solar Shut-down.
(2:44) And now, we have this: out of ACRIM and Duke University
. We've waited for a report on the Outer Planetary effect on the Sun and this one suggests multiple secular variations and predicts a prolonged Solar Minimum centred around 2030.
(2:58) In other words: it would need to start soon. But then again, it already has…hasn't it?
(3:04) There's not a Heliophysicist on the Planet who doesn't know that Sun's Magnetic Field is weakening
; and prominent scientists at the NSO have predicted that our next cycle may see a Sun unable to produce Sunspots
(3:17) For hundreds of thousands of years: the CO2 correlation to temperature has been astounding. But in recent years, we see the Planet isn't warming as fast as we're polluting.
(3:28) Our guesses on longer timelines suggest the correlation is weaker than it appears, and recently, the Atmospheric CO2
is pushing 400 parts per million with only slight changes in temperature.
(3:41) This video is a tangent from my video 'Energy from Space
' which details a larger picture and includes the other half of this coin.
(3:48) Never forget the Humans have survived this in the past and it could all go back to normal at any time; but I'd also consider setting aside some time for long-term planning. Be safe everyone.
Original Video by Suspicious0bservers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuYTcnN7TQk
Original Transcript by Suspicious0bserversCollective: http://suspicious0bservers.tumblr.com/post/50262498455/transcript-for-the-next-ice-age-an-introduction
Transcript for Video: Energy from Space 2.0 AND June 30, 2013 NEWS
(0:01) Good morning folks, we have some new information about changes in the solar system, plus we could always use a review; Venus is the story today, so lets start from the outside and come in.
has been photographed by Hubble since it's inception, but until recently was not able to see the Auroras out there; must have been quite a show.
, god of the harvest, saw stormier skies than usual. Storm predictably comes every 30 years and lasts a few dozen days, but the most recent events started a decade early and lasted over 200 days. NASA's observations also indicate Saturn's rotation
is slowing; they think it's their measurement error...right.
(0:39) After 50 years of careful observation of Jovian Radio Emissions
, Zeus now whistles in a different octave. The visual scape of Jupiter changed dramatically, from the chemistry to the energetic events.
(0:50) I call this: storms and stripes
. And then the alleged asteroid impact last year
; the thing is they admit to seeing no debris in the clouds from the explosion, but also, no cloud hole punch in case it somehow had remained intact. The concentric circles are my favorite part; they never discuss that.
(1:08) Mars has apparently taken some magnificent quakes recently
, interesting trick for a planet they said had no tectonics.
(1:15) Most of you know that slowing of Venus' rotation
is not disputed, but now we have further evidence of changes there. Over the last six years: the weather on Venus
has been becoming more and more extreme. Now consider everything you have seen and then how lucky Earth is to have not changed to those extremes. Now lets jump back in time to revisit some of the Earth changes we are experiencing.
(1:40) Earth's poles are shifting
, magnetic poles that is. For simplicity I have labeled the top, bottom two and middle point of Official North Pole measurements. The first 73 years at the bottom represent normal pole migration but the 68 years, up to 1972, shows a large jump. A similar migration is taken to the top, 2001, but this took only 29 years. We know that as of a few years ago it was traveling 40 miles a year towards Siberia
(2:06) Globally our protective magnetic shield is 10% weaker
than it was in the 19th Century and the World Center for Geomagnetism claims the weakening began in the 1600's.
(2:15) That's Earth's protective interface with 'Energy from Space,' 10% gone; 10% more energy coming in
. Not just the extra Solar Energy they measure, but on all wavelengths and frequencies; not to mention the Cosmic Ray and Gamma Ray Bursts not coming from the Sun.
(2:34) Never found a climate scientist considering this fact in their findings. Observers, here, know that the rare polar phenomenon, known as Noctilucent Clouds, has recently become a normal sight at mid-latitudes in Summer
(2:47) Or that the boring F1 Layer Critical Frequency, that boringly tracks with the Solar Cycle, decided to go nuts in 2007 indicating a serious energy change.
(2:58) As regular observers know: heat records are no joke, they're here
. But precipitation trumps them all, cold is at the heels of heat and is actually winning the race in the United States in 2013; and, you might want to ask Europe and India about the end of 2011.
(3:13) Compounding the weather changes is the collapsing atmosphere
. NASA's confusion about the drop, confuses me. They explain that solar flares expand our atmosphere and that the lack of flares during solar minimum
makes it collapse. They claimed this recent drop was too large and must be due to global warming. Meanwhile, they'd spent the last few years gawking at how long the solar minimum was lasting
and how record low it had gone
. The factor that they claim 'collapses the atmosphere' was major in two ways, according to NASA, and both of these videos explain it well and show their sources.
'Energy from Space
' & 'The Next Ice Age
(3:49) Since the coronal hole anomalies in 2007
we have had fewer sunspots, even as we are supposed to be getting into solar maximum. And less Earth-directed flaring from those spots, not meeting their magnetic classification and almost every major flare has been on the limb; CME's favoring the backside as well.
(4:08) So why is the Sun lacking in power? Where is the Sun's energy? I might submit there's evidence to suggest we should hypothesis a general energy shift to the planets.
(4:18) What you are seeing is that while the planets have been acting up the strength of the Sun's polar fields is fading. What you are seeing is not a plot of sunspots, and it is not a plot of flaring strength but a slow, steady decline of solar magnetism over decades
(4:34) You know what happens when magnetic fields of the Sun are absent: we get coronal holes, Alfvén waves
and better energy transfer from the Sun to the planets; at least according to NASA.
(4:44) Let me remind you that humans have once before witnessed such a sunspot shyness towards Earth that occurred during the Maunder Minimum, the greatest observed solar shutdown.
(4:54) Earth's shield is fading, the entire system is on the fritz; no climate scientist seems to care. And again, if they make you think it's your fault: it's a lot easier to usher in Agenda 21
now, isn't it? I'll open up that can of worms later. Eyes open, no Fear. Be safe everyone...and I guess I'll tack the news on to the end of this.
Transcript for NEWS June 30, 2013:
(5:17) Hope that was helpful. Rumbia
: got done with the Philippines now headed across the South China Sea to Hong Kong.
(5:24) Meanwhile, across the Pacific: tropical storm is forming off the Mexico coastline and will nudge northward before swinging out to sea.
(5:32) Other top watch tonight is in the USA
: actually this U-shape of storm potential actually stretches from Canada down into Mexico. It is driven by this massive, cooler air rushing south where it meets any significant heat and moisture along the convergence line
: they will equalize and everyone on the ground below it, will know it.
: actually got some development up North with larger, yet still separated umbras; got some trailing development exiting the southwest and the new guys on the limb could use a pick me up.
(6:02) This is the Solar Wind
from two days ago: you remember how simultaneous the speed, density and plasma temperature spikes occur when CME's arrive. Well yesterday: we saw density rising first, and then speed and plasma appear to start rising and what do you know?
(6:19) Yesterday we saw the density falling, all day, speed continued to rise, all day, and actually might not be done yet. That's the non-simultaneous impact of a coronal hole stream, rather than a CME.
(6:31) Always remember: it's the density spikes that jab our magnetic field
, so, disturbance is waning as density falls; Canadian Magnetometers indicating the same.
(6:42) Still got some energetic flux as we await the CME from a few days ago; the one Tony Phillips and NOAA agreed
will hit the Earth tonight.
(6:49) Probably also need to monitor the Umbral Fields
: they remain closed but with energy arriving at Earth and coronal hole factors about to be elevated we just have to watch and wait for the opening.
(6:59) Only two 5-pointers in the last 24 hours
, close call as well, again, near Antarctica.
(7:05) Now let me show you the last two weeks of Earthquakes: looking only for 6 magnitude and higher. The lone hit was a 6.4 in the Atlantic the same day that trans-equatorial coronal hole faced Earth.
(7:18) And as we await the new ones, prominently up North, remember that the last one was not a full watch because there were not energetic factors; just the coronal hole. Now here comes some more: 1) Coronal Hole 2) CME on the way 3) Energetic Flux 4) Venus/Ceres conjoin July!
(7:29) We got shots of our Eastern Limb and Southern Limb; and you'll see why. First one in 171 Angstroms reveals too much S-Curve in the largest yellow magnetic loop, might pop.
(7:39) Eyes open, no fear. It's 6:15 AM Eastern Time and that's the news. Be safe everyone.Original Video
Original Transcript by: Suspicious 0bservers Collective
Transcript for video: Energy from Space Published on Jan 21, 2013
(0:37) I am always suspicious when I only hear one side of any story. Our climate has changed throughout history and all evidence suggest it's happening again, now.
(0:47) And finally, the loudest voices in the world have begun to offer more than just 'Carbon Emissions' as an excuse for the shift; it's something I've suggested for a while, and what follows is a review of the facts without the sensationalism behind which they are too often veiled.
(1:03) Make no mistake: Carbon Dioxide, both man-made and natural, does play a role; along with Methane and Water Vapor. The greenhouse gas correlation to temperature has been remarkable for hundreds of thousands of years; CO2, temperature, methane in blue, red and green
(1:21) We have recently seen an even more extreme increase in CO2
; nearing 400 parts per million in the atmosphere. And on those longer time scales it looks like this:
(1:31) And with the last few years temperature changing only slightly we can say that the CO2 curve has officially deviated from the correlated temperature
(1:39) Our longer term data
: over hundreds of millions of years is less certain, based on more guesses and different analysis. But our best guesses show that those greenhouse gas correlations have not held true over millions of years and that, right now, Earth has not yet hit the historic high-temperature mark.
(1:59) Those pushing for a lone, Carbon-Causation like to show
that the Sun's energy is flatter over the same time period, and this is where the alternative hypothesis begins…Space-weather: The Turning Tide of the Discourse
(2:10) First: the Sun's energy absolutely does Eb and Flow and has generally increased over the last 70 years, even if only slightly.
(2:18) NASA recently joined this discussion: forcefully asserting that slight Solar Variability
can have drastic changes on the climate; scientists are observing that this is one of the most influential climate forcing factors
(2:30) Daily viewers in our community were set alight, as they had heard this before, it's certainly not a new notion but we are now gaining more of a understanding of how the Sun and Cosmic Rays affect our climate; we're learning the true power of energy from Outer Space
(2:46) One aspect of this currently under dispute. As the mechanism for Cosmic Ray cloud formation is well understood
, recent data present contradictory observations
; this, of course, does not change the fact
that they ionize the atmosphere
and electro-chemically destroy the Ozone
when Oxygen and Nitrogen square off.
(3:05) Keeping in mind the move towards Space-weather influence of the climate; the piece of the puzzle that gets almost no mention in the press, is the one I consider most important:
(3:15) Earth's protective interface with 'Energy from Space,' known as the Magnetosphere: this is the visualization of it weakening over the last 400 years
(3:24) Considering that this is well-known in the scientific community
-it's curious that we do not hear more about it
-even as NASA finds it doing it's 'Swiss-Cheese impression.
'The Magnetic Pole Shift
(3:39) Earth's magnetism changes in other ways, as the pole shift you may have heard about
, has indeed begun.
(3:45) Over 73 years, the normal movement of the Magnetic North Pole was slightly above average, but after that it began racing faster. 1904 to 1972 represents a shorter 68-year time period, then it took that same large jump in less than 30 years.
(4:02) Again, the Scientific Community is well-aware
that: it doesn't stop, not in 2005
and not in late 2010
; there are not regular, reliable updates on this and that needs to be fixed.Skyfall: Atmospheric Collapse in Progress
(4:21) The Discovery article I usually site here has been removed; that's a double-edged sword considering they try to blame CO2 in the sub-title.
(4:30) But CNN picked up the story
, along with many other outlets; NASA confirming that they do not understand the recent drop in our atmosphere. The reason I like the Discovery article is cause they are so close to the answer, they even say: Solar Minimum shrinks the atmosphere.
(4:46) Well, the recent Solar Minimum started normally for a few years, but, in 2007 the Coronal Holes began to leave their normal Polar Position
, and broke for lower latitudes.
(4:57) Then, the Minimum known to shrink the atmosphere deep
into lower than it had in a long time, and it didn't stop. Going even lower
, and continued extra-low levels beyond when the Minimum was supposed to end
(5:10) Solar Maximum would normally expand the atmosphere, but the red line is expert predictions for the cycle
: very low. And the actual Sunspot numbers are clearly lower, furthermore, the flaring from Earth-facing Sunspots appears not to match the potential, based on magnetic classification.
(5:29) It's more than just Atmospheric collapse, it's over-ionization: too much energy taken in. This is one year of Critical Frequency readings of the F-1 Layer of the Ionosphere, near the end of the previous Solar Minimum that closed out the 1990's.
(5:45) This: follows the Solar Cycle, so naturally it went up at the last Maximum that kicked-off the new Millennium; came back down to start the Solar Minimum normally for a few years. But again, 2007 brought anomaly as the readings spiked despite the deep, prolonged minimum. And continued far off the charts. For more serious students of these topics: the combined collapse and over-energetic state of the Ionosphere and Atmosphere may play a role in the recent explosion of Noctilucent Cloud sightings across the globe.Solar System Shift
(6:20) We already know the Sun is breaking stride, and it's not just him and Earth; Venus' rotation is measurably slowing
: the rates may seem trivial to us but on a planetary scale it's actually quite significant.
(6:32) Modern Mars quakes
, the 'Moon Quakes' version of this article has gone missing as well, but there's evidence of recent huge seismic activity.
(6:41) Jupiter is the most-changing of the planets, a new 'Red Spot' as the prominent planet wide stripe fades considerably
. After 50 years of monitoring Radio Jupiter a new song emanates from Zues
, and, a true Electromagnetic Event:
(6:56) The 2012 Jupiter Flash
: was blamed on asteroid impact, but there's no debris from an explosion and no cloud hole from an intact-impacter; it's the concentric circles that give it away.
(7:09) The Saturn Storm
was only recently confirmed to be an anomaly, Saturn storm's like this are regular occurrences every 30 years or so, but this was a decade early and has become the 'Energizer Bunny' of Saturn storms.
(7:21) In 2004 they brushed off Saturn's slowing rotation as 'their error,' perhaps not
. And for as long as Hubble has been out there: it was just recently able to see the Auroras of Uranus
; you can faintly see it's little rings as well.Why is this happening?
(7:41) You know the Mayans never predicted a thing about 'Doomsday,' but the Baktun, and their notion of a long Solar Cycle, may have merit. As I said: the Minimum was severe, the Maximum is weak so far and the Sunspots are not flaring.
(7:56) NASA is also joining the growing number of us worried about the Earth-facing quiet; they wonder if we're entering a significant minimum. The Sun's magnetic field is weakening as well, and if one Mayan Baktun is 394.26 years: the last one started with the 'great' Maunder Minimum.
(8:13) But that is also the time when our Magnetic Field began to fade, the poles have begun to shift, which certainly did not happen last time.
(8:22) There could be an outside force even further at work on a Galactic level. The ENA Ribbon is a Magnetic Signature on the Heliosphere, the magnetic shield of the Sun surrounding the Solar System
(8:33) It turns the Solar Wind around, forcing it and ENA's into the inner-system: this is Titan's atmosphere being bombarded with ENA's
(8:43) The Interstellar Magnetic Field is perfectly perpendicular to the ENA Ribbon
, suggesting a right-hand rule of Electromagnetism forcing the Ribbon; this could be everything or nothing-the answer to why this is happening-we just don't know.Weather Modification: A Brief Macro-Scale Introduction
(9:03) But the planet is changing; it's all extremes, not just warming. And it does appear to have begun long before humans had the chance to be it's genesis or simply speed up it's process
; not that they aren't trying to have a say in the matter in every corner of the globe.
(9:20) Solar Radiation Management
is the name given to their efforts to stop planetary warming; you've seen those days when the airplane trails don't disappear, but grid, and blanket the sky.
(9:31) The spraying of aerosols is supposed to be a last resort-not supposed to be in full-operation over our heads-patents even describe spraying out of airplanes.
(9:40) There are other aspects of weather modification: involving wave propagation and air ionization. All types: high-frequency, low-frequency, on land, ships, planes-even satellites-more than I can name.
(9:53) Many believe you can see their signatures on Radar
, and in the clouds
. When it comes to that Radar equipment: there are those who believe their use of these frequencies is not just and more than what they're telling us, which would indeed be scary considering they're everywhere across the United States, and the globe.
(10:10) I'm not an expert on all these devices but I will give you one piece of advice: HAARP
, the High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program
, refers only to high-frequency conductivity modulation of the Auroral-Electrojet near the poles.
(10:23) There are Tesla-Arrays
, NEXRADs and other devices that need no help from HAARP; spread all across the globe. And when you see this in Iowa
, you have to ask: is this the result of electrical changes in the Northern Lights or the result of closer Weather Modification in 'chemtrails.'
(10:40) I know this might seem scary: them trying to stop some magnificent shift here on Earth; and if they told us the truth, we'd probably panic. Anarchy would ensue and ruin everything they were trying to save.
(10:52) However, it's a terrible idea to 'play god.' I have no faith that they understand the long-term effects of these technologies and humans seemed to have survived this in the past.
(11:03) They may be doing more harm than good. They may be lying about it's implementation and the aluminium oxide aerosols are toxic to plants and animals; including humans.
(11:13) You know, people like me never thought the Mainstream Media, and NASA, would push these topics in this way. How long until they tell us the rest of the story? Perhaps one might consider preparing ones family in case things don't magically go back to normal; the path forward is clear. Eyes open, no fear. Be safe everyone.
Original Video by Suspicious0bservers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yy3YJBOw_o
Original Transcript by Suspicious0bserversCollective: http://suspicious0bservers.tumblr.com/post/47893031399/transcript-for-video-energy-from-space-published